Nowadays, because Dokdo is noisy. However, the Japanese people than you might think about the Dokdo issue chabunhada are exposed to the oesin Press. In contrast, Korea is noisy. On-citizens are seething inside bubbles. However, at a time like this cold dense wonder how calm and logical response is urgent.
Inadvertently mistaken for emotional support you get caught in Japan may be becoming involved in the strategy intact. Nagadoe ilbonttang not responded calmly various research and feed people all over the world, it's very important deulegeseo recognized. Semiconductor Research Foundation of Northeast Asia, such is the power bloggers named Dokdo. About the Dokdo islets power bloggers have more interest doendeseo departure. 've Seen about Dokdo.
☞ Islets of 10 kinds of Japanese do not know is the truth?
Japanese do not know the truth, there are 10 kinds of Dokdo. Dokdo Research Institute for Northeast Asia Foundation and with the help of the Japanese do not know about 10 kinds of Dokdo've seen the truth.
1. "Japan since ancient times were aware of the presence of Dokdo"
Inspector wire marked map of Japan as the most representative Nagakubo Sekisui (长久 保 赤水) of the "revised Japanese room nojeong conduction (改正 日本 舆 地 路程 全 图)" (1779), etc. Japan's various maps and literature can verify this is
But Japan's claim is false. Revised Japanese nojeong conduction room "created by individuals sachan (私 撰) to map the first edition in 1779, Ulleungdo and Dokdo of Korea to the mainland and has not been painted with lead inspector outside the island's drawn out in the area is recognized in Japan.
Moreover, Japan's observation (官 撰) documentation, and Japan and Dokdo in South Korea was recognized as a territory that can be clearer. Modern Japanese Foreign Ministry, "joseongukgyojesimalnaetamseo (朝鲜 国 交际 始末 内 探 书)" (1870 year data 1), the "Takeshima (Ulleungdo) and Song (Dokdo) as a part of Korea is the matter," the report ttangimeul jainhan bar by creating a Dokdo is South Korea.
In addition, the Japanese Navy in 1876 issued the resistance "of the east coast of Korea (朝鲜 东 海岸 图)" such as the observation (官 撰) Map (Base 2) also to include Dokdo is Korea's territory.
1877 Japan's top government agency taejeong management of the late 17th century Tokugawa Shogunate fell Ulleungdo illustrations ban based on the "... pumuihan of intent 竹 岛 (Ulleungdo) and other 一 岛 (islets), the thing about Japan is not involved. Remember," he Takeshima by Japanese Ministry of Home Affairs tells that the territory of Japan was officially recognized.
2. "Dokdo in Korea since ancient times and was aware of no evidence?"
Korea claims that Dokdo side umbrella umbrella, but that do not exist seomyigeona Ulleungdo as islands.
You can see with the naked eye from Dokdo in Ulleungdo Ulleungdo since people started living islets were able to recognize. The result of this recognition, "Annals of three kinds," "jiriji" (1454), the "umbrella (Dokdo) and Mureung (Ulleungdo) stalling the islands prefecture sea is to: Two islands far away from each other ahnihayeo notch can be seen if the weather is sunny, "he has written.
"As well as nephropathy, Dongguk room seungram" (1530), "Dongguk literature etc" (1770), "Expiration Cradle" (1808), "Enlargement literature etc" (1908), and South Korea's many observations (官 撰) document Dokdo in old umbrella designee is clearly marked. In particular, "Dongguk literature etc", "Expiration Cradle," "Enlargement literature etc" and so forth, "Ulleungdo and a land of umbrella Usanguk all, they say the Japanese umbrella Song " is written as: Song's name at the time because the Japanese call Takeshima umbrella stand testimony to the fact that Dokdo soon. Maps are maps of Korea or East Sea sachan gwanchanjidoyideun two islands, namely with Ulleungdo and Dokdo islets and the presence of a clearly shows that you were aware.
Unlike today, the lack of cartographic technology position and size of islets that mistake, but it did not recognize the existence of Dokdo is not evidence.
3 "In the mid-17th century, Japan had established sovereignty of Dokdo"
Even early era (1618), Yonago, resident dottoribeonui Oya, Murakami and ambivalence Ulleungdo illustrations from the Tokugawa Shogunate receives a license from Ulleungdo exclusively to overthrow the shogunate and fishing, etc. Contribution said. Ie, diagram to Japan for Ulleungdo goals during the voyage to the marina, or take a good fishing gangchina overthrow the latest Dokdo in the mid-17th century was to establish the sovereignty of Dokdo.
But Japan's claim is false is why. Government literature, and was recognized as hangukttang Ulleungdo and Dokdo. Graphical illustration of the island's license in Japan that his country is a document that does not require deneun Ulleungdo, Dokdo, which Japan rather than the territory of Japan does not recognize the fact that is testament to.
In the mid-17th century Japan gomunheonin "Eun Hall hapgi " (1667 years), the "Japan's Oki Island in the northwestern limits," he noted at the time of Japan's Dokdo Ulleungdo, except in its territory and can be seen that there were. Moreover, the late 17th century Japan, when the shogunate government disapproves of illustrations Ulleungdo "Takeshima (Ulleungdo) and other islands are supplied dottoribeone" Let he asked, dottoribeoneun "Takeshima (Ulleungdo), Song (Dokdo) as well as the other comes The island "not answered by the Ulleungdo and Dokdo
Dottoribeon has announced clearly that it is not part of.
4. "Japan's 17th century ban Ulleungdo illustrations, but illustrations of Dokdo was not prohibited"
Shogunate in 1696 determined that the territory of Korea and Ulleungdo Ulleungdo ban illustrations, but did not prevent a diagram of Dokdo. Dokdo, which Japan from the time I think its territory is clear that Op.
But Japan's claim is false. Japan jaryoin Oya family in a document "looks bamboo geunbyeonui Song " (1659 year) "Takeshima (Ulleungdo) in the Song (Dokdo)" (1660), etc. Describe the history of ancient times as the "islands of Dokdo Ulleungdo" was considered. So in January 1696 Ulleungdo illustration illustrations ban ban was included in the course of Dokdo.
As claimed by the Government of Japan, "Japan to cross over to the marina or eochaejiro Ulleungdo use Dokdo" in the first place yeoteumeuro the extent to which the sole purpose of illustration that Dokdo "Dokdo illustrations license" did not exist a thing. As a result, a separate "islets illustrations ban" will never have to make. Ulleungdo Dokdo by the late 17th century illustration illustrations along with a ban would make more sense to see Outlawed.
5. "An Yong-bok's statements credible information"
South Korea, citing as the basis for its claim for An Yong-bok's statements about his illegal Doyle made during interrogation, is not consistent with the fact that many of Japan's history is not on the content.
But Japan's claim is false. An Yong-bok's Doyle comes to activities in the thoroughness of Korea bibyeonsa yirueojyeoteu recorded, so it gwanchanseo history of Korea from Japan that is not true and claims it is difficult to accept.
In addition to the history of shipbuilding in Japan's history simply because there is no credible evidence to say that shipbuilding is unfair.
※ Doyle activities of An Yong-bok, "Annals of Sukjong", "Diaries of the Royal Secretariat," "literature, Dongguk Remarks such as" Korea's gwanchanseowa "bamboo articles", "jukdodohaeyuraegibalseogong "," Chronology of workers "," jukdogo"is recorded in the literature such as Japan.
Due to the activities of An Yong-bok on Ulleungdo, Dokdo in Japan was discussed, as a result, two islands became recognized as a territory of Korea. An Yong-bok in the case of Korea and Japan has territorial issues between the two countries emerged in 1695 became the dottoribeon Ulleungdo, Dokdo belonging to the time to ask questions of the Tokugawa Shogunate in Japan dottoribeoneun "dottoribeone does not belong," he replied.
6. "Dokdo in Shimane Prefecture, built in 1905 reaffirmed the doctor was youngyu"
Japan, the Japanese government's 1905 decision by Cabinet is incorporated Dokdo islets in Shimane youngyu doctors claim that was reaffirmed. Nakai, Oki, Shimane owner yojaburoui incorporated territory of Dokdo, the Japanese government filed a petition in January 1905 Cabinet decision that the doctor jaehwakhayeotda youngyu Dokdo. The Governor of Shimane Prefecture in February the same year, the Oki islets were notified that the responsibility of Tosa.
But Japan's claim is false. Existed in 1905 based on Japan's Dokdo islets built without a master ttangyiraneun mujuji Ron was preempted. But the claim since the 1950s 'youngyu doctor confirmed to' have changed. Claims Dokdo as its territory, on the other hand, the unique mujuji preemption based on the 1905 Lawn hayeotdaneun incorporated into the territory it is realized that the mutually contradictory.
Youngyu physicians reaffirmed the country's inherent territory of Dokdo is based on the claim. Dokdo, but Japan's own territorial claims in 1877 that the administrative agency in Japan and Dokdo Ulleungdo taejeong management relationship with Japan in mind that you will not be placed in front of me to do with the fact.
Japan, South Korea's Dokdo eoeopin Nakai yojaburoneun know that the territory of Korea through the Japanese government has tried to file a petition leases. But the Navy and Ministry of Foreign Affairs Management (gimosseuke Ganesh Yuki yamaja to engineer) in 1904, and received four weeks of the territory transfer petition has been submitted.
However, at the time the Home Office Management (Inoue Clerk) of the "Korea ttangyiraneun doubt if we transfer the unwanted attention to the reef and to foreign countries to Japan, South Korea has greatly doubt that byeongtanharyeogo," said the territory of Dokdo petition was opposed to the transfer.
In addition to this inspector, reoiljeonjaeng exploits during the war, the peninsula of Japan are Japanese Cabinet decision in January 1905 and February of Shimane Prefecture in Japan incorporated Dokdo into action, in practice, no inquiries about the Empire have been made unilaterally and without notice . Also, for the Empire October 25, 1900 Edict No. 41 (ID 9) to the jurisdiction of Dokdo-gun provisions in 1905 because of Shimane Prefecture of Japan's unilateral action of the transfer, of course, is the act void.
South Korea visited in March 1906 Ulleungdo transfer from Shimane Prefecture, management said that the fact that after the first time they have found. The number-gun, Gangwon gwanchalsa this fact immediately, the next day and was reported to the central government. Instead of an internal rather than receiving reports and chamjeong the "Dokdo is Japanese territory that I do not see any evidence", saying the facts were instructed to re-investigate. But already in November 1905 South Korea eulsa Neuk status as a drug because it was deprived oegyogwon two could not have any diplomatic protests. Maeilsinbo on (01/05/1906) and hwangseongsinmun (05/09/1906) transferring the territory of Dokdo as Japan's media availability of illegal actions has been reported.
7. "San Francisco Peace Treaty is a foundation course in Japan, the United States under the jurisdiction of Dokdo was any suggestion that"
Japan's claim based on the San Francisco Peace Treaty in the course in Korea and Takeshima in Japan, two need to include the claimed territory. But Japan's Dokdo under the jurisdiction of the United States and the request that was refused. 1951 San Francisco Peace Treaty and Japan to accept its independence all right, title and claim abandoned shipbuilding 'is not included in the Dokdo.
But Japan's claim is false. November 1949 San Francisco Peace Treaty was created prior to viewing the basic document, the United States and Dokdo in South Korea was recognized as a territory. December 1949 through the week, the U.S. political adviser William siboldeureul Japan due to lobbying by Japan to the U.S. to give up territory, although not at the right time in the islets, Dokdo is larger than each of the myriad islands of South Korea was not timely. The number of all the islands of the Republic of Korea geomyeonghal bored of it has not? Therefore, as a result recognized Dokdo as Japanese territory can not be interpreted.
Allied General Headquarters of the Second World War until after the San Francisco Peace Treaty into force in Japan, Dokdo has been treated separately. Allied General Headquarters of the Japanese occupation period in Japan over the Dokdo Ulleungdo with the rule that is exempt from the prescribed area memorandum of Allied Supreme Commander (SCAPIN) No. No. 677 (01/29/1946) has applied for.
※ SCAPIN Lake No. 677, "a little area around the politically separate from the executive in Japan Memorandum on dee"
3. Two for the purposes of the Directive, Japan's four main island of Japan (Hokkaido, Honshu, Kyushu and Shikoku) and nearly 1,000 that includes two smaller adjacent islands are defined. (1,000 smaller adjacent islands). ⒜ not exclude Ulleungdo, riangkureuam (Liancourt Rocks: Dokdo) is ... etc..
Allied General Headquarters in Japan is such an area of Dokdo is handled separately from the Japanese 'pirated by violence and greed "to give up the territory specified in Cairo Declaration (1943) and the Potsdam Declaration (1945) established by the UN's, etc. before and after the treatment is in accordance with policy.
September 1951 San Francisco Peace Treaty was signed this coalition has succeeded in the action. October 1951 the Government of Japan on the basis of the San Francisco Peace Treaty with Japan, the area marked "area of Japan" were made in the House of Parliament, clearly draw the line on the map of Japan in the area, except islets Dada. Dokdo in 1945, returned to Korea in accordance with Japan's defeat, and the San Francisco Peace Treaty, it will be verified.
8. "Dokdo bombing of U.S. Forces Training Area designation recognizes the evidence of Japan's sovereignty over Dokdo"
Dokdo in the 1952 bombing of U.S. Forces Training Area designated as the fact that Dokdo is Japanese territory indicates that US Administrative Agreement Committee on the basis of US government agreement to use U.S. forces bombed a week training section, specify one of the islets were notified in the Official Journal of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, it was a.
But Japan's claim is false. Korea Dokdo at the time of the fishermen was the main fishing activity areas. However, the Japanese government for Japan's territorial claim to Dokdo to Korea Dokdo fishermen were in the operation despite the fact that many suffered damage to the U.S. military's bombing of Dokdo designated as training areas and bombing sent to training. The fact that Congress in Japan can be found through remarks.
※ In 1952, 5. 23 House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee of Shimane Prefecture in the city or the former Yamamoto members extra value to the query Ishihara answered by Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs
Yamamoto, Senator: "The Japanese garrison in the designation of Dokdo yeonseupji around this practice that is specified destination (Dokdo) confirmed that Japan's territorial susceptible rather than in the idea that the Foreign Ministry wants to specify yeonseupji please tell us about it. "
Secretary Ishihara: "Mostly in promoting such a concept seems to vary from."
This week, the U.S. military's bombing of Dokdo, as specified by the fact that training areas, but the protests in South Korea under the U.S. Air Force bombed the immediate training area in islets was off side, the fact that South Korea has formally notified.
9. "Korea illegally occupied Dokdo is now"
Dokdo in South Korea by occupation made with no basis in international law, illegal occupation, and any action taken in Dokdo in Korea there is no legal justification. Dokdo in South Korea for illegal occupation, Japan has repeatedly protested harsh.
But Japan's such a claim is false. Shimane Korea Dokdo in 1905 before transferring sovereignty over Dokdo since liberation in 1945, was established as a move away from Dokdo was Japanese. Since 1948 'Dodong-ri Nam-myeon gu-gun, Gyeongsangbuk-do' given to the address and have justly wield sovereignty.
The current administrative area of Dokdo-gun, Gyeongsangbuk-do is a bungee ulreungeup dokdori 1-96, and South Korea's police, government officials, residents over 40 are resident. Ulleungdo and Morin a sightseeing flight between Ulleungdo and Dokdo, and more than a year, 100,000 tourists have visited the Dokdo.
In addition, South Korea's Dokdo in order to preserve the natural environment and ecosystems, natural monument in 1982 and 336 islets, "Dokdo algae breeding ground" was designated in 1999, "islets of natural protected areas" and that name has been changed. In 2000, by the Ministry of Environment Notification No. 2000-109 heading 'certain books' designated, are protected. Therefore, the Japanese government's claim de facto territory of South Korea's unilateral acts that threaten the sovereignty only.
10. "Dokdo's sovereignty issue should be resolved in the International Court of Justice."
Japanese sovereignty over the Dokdo issue, the Japanese referred to the International Court of Justice, were proposed was rejected by South Korea. September 1954, the Japanese government in March 1962 referred the matter to the proposal of the International Court of Justice, but Korea does not take sides, it has reached the current
However, both Japan's claims are false. Dokdo is Japan's territorial compromise was exploits during reoiljeonjaeng jeonjaengin regained the territory of the Republic of Korea obvious to the International Court of Justice does not have any reason martialed.
Japan, China and Russia cheomgakyeoldo (expletive there) and namkurilyeoldo (Northern Territory) in question referred to the International Court of Justice, by refusing to Dokdo toxic only to the claims referred to the International Court of Justice. Japanese examples of dual attitudes, and Takeshima in Japan for the territory they claim that there is no falsification can be interpreted also known.
The Japanese government claims sovereignty over Dokdo itself to me to give up is the only way to solve this problem. (Source: Northeast Asian History Foundation)
☞ Japanese claims to spell everything out of the heoguseong pahechija
Japan claims that Dokdo sweetie, land on the basis of a thorough response to the logic to get it nullified. Related to Dokdo and Japan, and many claims are false. Properly notified about this claim, or delusions of Japan's bad ploy kkaechil harusokhi allow us to engage in the effort.
No comments:
Post a Comment